Showing posts with label Netflix. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Netflix. Show all posts

Monday, February 21, 2011

That Was Then, This Is Now

I've been looking at a lot of older films lately.  Older as in 60's and 70's.  Movies like The Graduate, Deliverance, Midnight Express, Butch Cassidy & The Sundance Kid, Altered States, Bonnie & Clyde.  What I've discovered is that once upon a time in this great industry of ours story was key and dialogue was plentiful.  Story, I love.  Dialogue?  Well, it has to be extremely well written, acted, directed for me to be blown away by it.  I like beats and long silences that bring out emotion or visual stimulation in film.  I'm finding, though, that the 60's and 70's didn't have a whole lot of that.  Movies from that era had ridiculous amounts of conversation for a good 2 hours that really made the actor or actress a focal point that seems to be missing in recent movies.

Let's take the movie 'Network' for example.  Charles saw it a couple weeks ago and wouldn't stop raving about it.  I'd seen it years ago so had a foggy memory of what it was like.  'Network' was streaming on Netflix so I figured I should take advantage of that before it went away.  And I'm really glad I did.  What a fantastic piece of work!  Brilliant acting and one very prophetic and daring screenplay. 

Network was 121 minutes of conversation.  When there wasn't conversation there was narration.  I think the only time there was a beat or pause was during the breakup speech from William Holden to Faye Dunaway.  There were 3 profound and unforgettable speeches in this movie and so much hidden meaning blatantly discussed in front of what is considered now to be an impressionable and sensitive film audience.  Subjects such as media exploitation, creating story for ratings rather than reporting the truth, sensationalism, corporatism, communism, and fascism were all covered in this movie quite well.  The live footage of a militant guerrilla group (who would today be labeled terrorist) sets Faye Dunaway's character, Diana Christensen, on a wild ride as she, the heartless TV programmer who'll stop at nothing to be number 1, comes up with the idea to exploit the leftist groups and individuals by putting them on TV.  Her pitch to them is to offer up an audience of millions who will hear their radical message.

They buy.  Peter Finch's character, the nutty Howard Beale, buys into it.  Laureen Hobbs, (" I'm Laureen Hobbs, a badass commie nigger.") played by Marlene Warfield, buys into it and buys into it hard as she yells her head off at one point realizing that all of the money supposed to go to her guerrilla group is being spread out to different network interests in the form of profit percentages.  That speech is one of my three faves.  As negotiations are being worked out Laureen Hobbs blows her stack saying not at all what one would expect from such a militant.

140.  INT. THE FARMHOUSE - LIVING ROOM



                            STEIN

                      (a nervous man, to the new

                       arrivals, now entering)

                Where the hell have you been?



                            MIGGS

                      (embracing the

                       GREAT KHAN)

                Ahmed, sweet, that dodo you sent

                for a driver couldn't find this

                fucking place.



      There is a genial exchange of helloes and waves between

      the phalanxes of AGENTS --



                            STEIN

                Let's get on with this before

                they raid this place, and we all

                wind up in the joint.



                            ED

                      (to FREDDIE now

                       pulling up a crate)

                We're on Schedule A, page seven,

                small c small i --



                            MIGGS

                      (whisking through her

                       copy of the contract)

                Have we settled that sub-licensing

                thing? We want a clear definition

                here.  Gross proceeds should consist

                of all funds the sublicensee receives

                not merely the net amount remitted

                after payment to sublicensee or

                distributor.



                            STEIN

                We're not sitting still for over-

                head charges as a cost prior to

                distribution.



                            LAUREEN

                      (whose nerves have

                       worn thin, explodes:)

                Don't fuck with my distribution

                costs!  I'm getting a lousy two-

                fifteen per segment, and I 'm already

                deficiting twenty-five grand a week

                with Metro.  I'm paying William

                Morris ten percent off the top!

                      (indicates the

                       GREAT KHAN)

                -- And I'm giving this turkey ten

                thou a segment and another five for

                this fruitcake --

                      (meaning MARY ANN GIFFORD)

                And, Helen, don't start no shit

                with me about a piece again!

                I'm paying Metro twenty percent of

                all foreign and Canadian distribution,

                and that's after recoupment!  The

                Communist Party's not going to see

                a nickel out of this goddam show

                until we go into syndication!



                            MIGGS

                Come on, Laureen, you've got the

                party in there for seventy-five

                hundred a week production expenses.



                            LAUREEN

                I'm not giving this pseudo in-

                surrectionary sectarian a piece

                of my show!  I'm not giving him

                script approval!  And I sure as

                shit ain't cutting him in on my

                distribution charges I



                            MARY ANN GIFFORD

                         (screaming in from

                         the back)

                Fuggin fascist! Have you seen the

                movies we took at the San Marino

                jail break-out demonstrating the

                rising up of a seminal prisoner-

                class infrastructure!



                            LAUREEN

                You can blow the seminal prisoner-

                class infrastructure out your ass!

                I'm not knocking down my goddam

                distribution charges!



      The GREAT KHAN decides to offer an opinion by SHOOTING

      his PISTOL off into the air. This gives everybody

      something to consider, especially WILLIE STEIN who

      almost has a heart attack.



                            THE GREAT KHAN

                Man, give her the fucking over-

                head clause.


Then, of course, there is the infamous speech by Peter Finch...
 

And finally, the daring and frightening honesty that pours forth from the mouth of Jensen...

      He leads HOWARD down the steps to the floor level,

      himself ascends again to the small stage and the podium.

      HOWARD sits in one of the 200 odd seats.  JENSEN pushes

      a button, and the enormous drapes slowly fall, slicing

      away layers of light until the vast room is utterly

      dark.  Then, the little pinspots at each of the desks,

      including the one behind which HOWARD is seated, pop on,

      creating a miniature Milky Way effect.  A shaft of white

      LIGHT shoots out from the rear of the room, spotting

      JENSEN on the podium, a sun of its own little galaxy.

      Behind him, the shadowed white of the lecture screen.

      JENSEN suddenly wheels to his audience of one and roars

      out:



                            JENSEN

                You have meddled with the primal

                forces of nature, Mr. Beale, and I

                won't have it, is that clear?!  You

                think you have merely stopped a

                business deal -- that is not the

                case!  The Arabs have taken billions

                of dollars out of this country, and

                now they must put it back.  It is

                ebb and flow, tidal gravity, it is

                ecological balance!  You are an old

                man who thinks in terms of nations

                and peoples.  There are no nations!

                There are no peoples!  There are no

                Russians.  There are no Arabs!

                There are no third worlds!  There is

                no West!  There is only one holistic

                system of systems, one vast and

                immane, interwoven, interacting,

                multi-variate, multi-national

                dominion of dollars! petro-dollars,

                electro-dollars, multi-dollars!,

                Reichmarks, rubles, rin, pounds and

                shekels!  It is the international

                system of currency that determines

                the totality of life on this planet!

                That is the natural order of things

                today!  That is the atomic,

                subatomic and galactic structure of

                things today!  And you have meddled

                with the primal forces of nature,

                and you will atone!  Am I getting

                through to you, Mr. Beale?

                      (pause)

                You get up on your little twenty-

                one inch screen, and howl about

                America and democracy.  There is no

                America.  There is no democracy.

                There is only IBM and ITT and A T

                and T and Dupont, Dow, Union Carbide

                and Exxon.  Those are the nations of

                the world today.  What do you think

                the Russians talk about in their

                councils of state -- Karl Marx?

                They pull out their linear

                programming charts, statistical

                decision theories and minimax

                solutions and compute the price-cost

                probabilities of their transactions

                and investments just like we do.  We

                no longer live in a world of nations

                and ideologies, Mr. Beale.  The

                world is a college of corporations,

                inexorably deter- mined by the

                immutable by-laws of business.  The

                world is a business, Mr. Beale!  It

                has been since man crawled out of

                the slime, and our children, Mr.

                Beale, will live to see that perfect

                world in which there is no war and

                famine, oppression and brutality --

                one vast and ecumenical holding

                company, for whom all men will work

                to serve a common profit, in which

                all men will hold a share of stock,

                all necessities provided, all

                anxieties tranquilized, all boredom

                amused.  And I have chosen you to

                preach this evangel, Mr. Beale.



                            HOWARD

                      (humble whisper)

                Why me?



                            JENSEN

                Because you're on television, dummy.

                Sixty million people watch you

                every night of the week, Monday

                through Friday.

Everything, I mean everything, dialogue in this movie is mind blowing.  Not only are these speeches fantastic but so is the everyday conversation...the producers sitting around having a frank discussion about killing Howard Beale, the confrontation between Schumacher & Hackett, the break up between Diana & Max discussed in terms of 'canceling the show'....Pick any part of this movie and you will find the conversation enthralling.  

Today we have movement, action, effects, cheap jokes, simplistic dialogue, and restrictions on everything (couldn't share the video clips for 2 of the 3 speeches above...that's how tight everything has become!).  Back then they simply told stories and let the viewers formulate their own opinions.   They assumed the audience was smart enough to understand.  They allowed freedom of expression, freedom of thought, freedom to create like we haven't seen in quite a while.  Writers wrote for actors and actresses not for corporations and formulas.  

We may never return to that kind of filmmaking again.  We may never be given that freedom to say what we as storytellers want to say in a film again.  But we will always have those older movies at our disposal to watch and re-watch as many times as we desire and remember that once there was a time when artists could put the business aside and simply be creative. - TKS




Monday, March 29, 2010

The Plight Of The Good Story

Ah, networking...Can anything else be so discouraging as a simple networking event can be?  I mean, I'm sure there can be, at least on an equal level anyway, but hear me out for a moment.  Seminars, panels, parties, and screenings.  Sometimes they're really great.  Sometimes they make me feel like I'm truly doing the right thing but sometimes they make me wish I'd gone into a more simpler industry...like brain surgery or rocket science maybe.

After a 5 hour session of seminars and panelists at the first iHollywood event in Santa Monica I felt like someone had gagged and bound me then thrown me in a trunk.  It started out innocently enough.  A couple hours of two speakers discussing financing and business plans while promoting their books at the same time.  I have to admit it was a little dry but if I listened closely I realized I was able to pick up some fine points.  John Reiss, author of a book called Think Outside the Box Office was the first speaker and Louise Levison, author of Filmmakers and Financing: Business Plans for Independents was the second speaker.  They gave us some pointers on the changing world of film distribution, what to put in a business plan and, well, ok, I think I tuned out after hearing them discuss a couple things I was already doing based on just plain common sense.  I recorded it though and at some random moment I suppose I'll go back and listen again as I do recall muttering a couple hmm's and huh's.  It's those classroom type situations that tend to force my mind into wander mode.  Never was good at absorbing a lecture unless it allowed me a dialogue and interaction as it went along.

Anyhow, we then broke for some networking and dinner.  Nick and I attended this one together and we parted at this point to schmooze with the crowd at separate tables.  I found myself with a man from Florida looking to distribute a comedy and a sci-fi he had just finished, a guy with a company that offered internet to TV programming, and an ex-wildlife cinematographer now somehow involved with the WWF.  I liked the latter guy and his charisma quite a bit.  Definitely social and easy to talk with.  Having always had a desire to do camera work for Discovery & National Geographic and being a big fan of "Planet Earth" I couldn't resist drilling him on some of his camera experience.  I got an interesting story or two on arctic shoots he had been on.  The Florida guy was a bit tough to get a flowing conversation going with but he was friendly enough and the internet guy offered a down to earth kind of sense of humor and demeanor.  My table was ok.  Nick, on the other hand, was across the room being questioned on why he didn't have his badge on, being tortured by IT guys, and having to fight his way into a conversation with a lady from Paramount.  He eventually came over after I texted him about the cinematographer.

We moved from dinner to a workflow presentation that lasted about 20 minutes.  By now it was just about endurance for me.  Find a little gem of info wherever I could was the goal.  But then the panel came up.  Oh the panel.  Six studio guys in black suit coats.  This whole panel changed the entire mood and seemed to start a small fire under my seat.  They all discussed the ever distracting new world of James Cameron's god forsaken 3D pioneering.  They seemed to praise 3D, big budget filmmaking and 2009 movie going like they'd struck Texas tea.  They asked the audience who we were..."Post production?" About 5 people.  "SAG, DGA, PGA, WGA?"  About 5 people. "Technology?"  About 5 people.  "How many people watch the Oscars?"  "Hahahaha"....The rest of us indie filmmakers were left out and on our own.  This should have tipped me off to the fact that I was in for an hour of frustration.

They started out saying movie ticket prices were going up this weekend.  Yay!  How much more money will the world demand from me for the simplest of things?  They moved into the gigantic success of 3D filmmaking and how "Avatar" helped everyone.  They backed that statement with numbers based on the big success of the opening weekend of "Alice In Wonderland".

Oh man.  Really?  I began to clamp down on my tongue.  Did they not realize that "Alice in Wonderland" did so well because it was and is a well known, classic work too many of us grew up with and loved?  Did they not know that had it been in 2D most of the same people would have gone to see it simply for Johnny Depp and Tim Burton?  The 3D was just a strange perk that added to the wild ride of that crazy story.  That's all.  That's it.  3D wasn't the driving force.  And actually turned out to be not so impressive to this movie goer or her companion when they ventured down the rabbit hole.

They continued on, saying thanks to the awesome 3D movement gigantic budgets would be the norm, less movies would be made, so less work for everyone.

Hurray!  Great for the thousands of us currently clamoring for jobs in the industry as it is now.

They continued on, praising big studio works and went so far as to state EVERYTHING would be in 3D sooooooonnnnnn!!!!!

Are they nuts?  I wondered.  Do they not realize the group of people they're talking with have not even one finger nail in the door of big studio production?

One little guy I'd seen before at some other panel and certainly filling big shoes, made the comment that the wrong movie had won the Oscars after another bashed the boredom of the entire show itself.

Boring?  Really?  Didn't they say the same thing last year?  Maybe it's award shows that are really not too thrilling to watch...Wait.  Did he just say?  Did he just say the wrong movie won the Best Picture Oscar this year?  Now I was squirming in my seat, teeth firmly on tongue, lips cemented together.  First of all, not one of the nominees was a best picture in my opinion.  Not one gave me that fulfilling feeling I get after seeing a masterpiece.  Not one.  BUT of them all the one that came close was the one that actually won, "Hurt Locker".  Damn good ol' boys.  Enough already.  It's 2010.  Granted the little guy was heavy on the marketing side of "Avatar" but come on.  Integrity? Art? Film?  Is it only business now?  Is it only how much money a movie makes that matters?  I guess so if you're going to be spending $200 million and up on each film...big hole in the joy of that amazing 3D trend I'd say.

So, after about a half hour of big studio ass kissing they suddenly turned around and said ultimately it was about story.  Concept.

Eh?  "Clash of the Titans"?  "Avatar"?  "Footloose"?  Remakes??  Where's the story there?  I looked around the room several times to try and read the faces of the audience.  Were they in agreement here?  Nick pronounced a bullshit at one point so I knew he was struggling as much as I was with the opinions of these men.

Then a lady spoke up and I knew we weren't alone...."So, so you're telling me I'm going to want to see "Sex In The City" in 3D?"  She informed the panel they were in a room of indie filmmakers and threw the SAG guy on the panel a bit of compassion for the magnitude of talent that would be struggling for work with this new technological advent.  Another lady, somewhere in the end, asked the question,  "How will digital media benefit me as an indie filmmaker?"  They questioned whether it was theatrical release or general exposure she wanted.  Her response was that she didn't know yet.  So what did she get?  A pat.  A patronizing pat on the head.  She was informed self distribution and marketing would be an opportunity as she would have a plethora of new media and internet at her fingertips.

Ha!  Right.  I've personally tried the internet distribution and grassroots marketing measures for someone else's feature film and no indie filmmaker has the money or manpower for it.  That is a super saturated world.  Try to find your demographic in a sea of invisible Youtube and Netflix watchers.  Damn near impossible at this moment.  And theater is where we all want our films shown.  Big, bold and beautiful.  Not on an Ipad, Iphone or computer monitor.

They went on to obliterate celluloid filmmaking.

I'm sorry but I love film.  I love the richness of it.  I love the artistry of it.  I don't want it to be obsolete any more than I want vinyl to be obsolete.  I completely understand the financial savings and ease of production and post production with digital but if I had the funds and had the choice 35mm would be the direction I'd go in every single time. Why turn our backs on it completely?

As we neared the end the panel emphasized how important good story was as much as they could and it was all I could do to wish nothing but evil on the Hollywood conglomerates.  I hoped 3D would be their downfall  not their success.  How quickly they did a 180 once they knew what the audience in front of them wanted to hear.  We left that building bursting with complaints and full of animated conversation as we drove up the 405.

My solution for those of us who need to keep our industry open to everyone interested in good visual storytelling is to create an equally powerful and competitive indie film community.  Fill it with independent film investors, distributors, filmmakers, and exhibitors.  And collaborate, collaborate, collaborate.  Come together and operate together.  Stop scrambling to be the next big blockbuster director if what you enjoy is crafting story based, intelligent and/or artistic movies.  Stop stepping on each other to get to the tiny top.  Start listening, talking, engaging other like minded movie makers and build a part of the industry that benefits everyone rather than just the Hollywood studio system.  New media may be good but seeing your creation on a large screen is great.  There's nothing that says independent film can't be out there competing with the giant machine currently way too overly impressed with 3D technology. - TKS